Thursday, March 30, 2006

Bonds Investigation Racist?

There was an interesting article in USA Today about the feelings of racism in the motives for the continued scrutiny of Barry Bonds. I'm never quite sure what to think about accusations of racism. Of course it would be naive to think there aren't racist people. There will always be those people who are going to have racial biases. What I don't understand is this idea that there is some sort of wide spread conspiracy against black people. Says Leonard Moore, director of African and African-American Studies at Louisiana State University:

"White America doesn't want him to (pass) Babe Ruth and is doing everything they can to stop him. America hasn't had a white hope since the retirement of (NBA star) Larry Bird, and once Bonds passes Ruth, there's nothing that will make (Ruth) unique, and they're scared. And I'm scared for Bonds.

I think what he'll go through will be 100 times worse than what Aaron went through. I pray for him every night."

I refuse to believe that "white America" is trying to stop Bonds just because he's black. The authors of the finger pointing book Game of Shadows argue that their book calls out a white guy and a woman. More than anything, these two reports are just trying to make a quick buck. Since the time I saw an interview with them, they struck me as the type of guys who would go around kicking puppies and writing stories about the new "puppy kicking scourge" breaking down decent society if they thought that it'd sell.

Not counting Bonds and the reporters, there are 8 people quoted in the story. 6 are black, 1 is white and 1 is Hispanic. Of the black people quoted, only Mike Cameron flat out calls out Bonds saying, "I'm a big believer in karma. What goes around comes around. If you don't treat people right, things come back to bite you." More accusatory quotes include Torii Hunter saying "It's killing me because you know it's about race" and former Twin Matt Lawton saying "If (Bonds) were white, he'd be a poster boy in baseball, not an outcast." Perhaps not surprisingly, Eric Chavez and Giants managing partner Pete Magowan - the only non-black people quoted - didn't feel that racism was a factor at all in the investigation.

I may have a problem of perspective. I'm young enough that I've never not known Barry Bonds to be a major league ball player. I have no idea what it was like for Hank Aaron, only from what I've read or seen on TV. I never lived in an overtly racist society like things used to be. Sure there is still racism, but people don't openly walk around being racist. As for my position on the matter, I think an open investigation is the only solution. Either Bonds is exonerated and we can just drop it all together or there is finally conclusive proof of substance use and we can just drop it all together. Wishful thinking, I know, there will be people who will never stop talking about this. There are those are going to be strongly opposed to the investigation as people trying to take down a prominent black man, and that will think if proof is found that they're just trying to frame him. I can't deny that the evidence seems overwhemling, but it still seems a little too circumstantial and he-said-she-said at this point.

As for how I feel about Bonds himself, I try not too. I'd probably be perpetually pissed off too if I had people bugging me with the same questions day after day for years. At times I feel sorry for him. I wouldn't want to have to put up with people's crap. I'd be unfair to form an opinion of him based off of his interviews. I just hope that he's been telling the truth, because I couldn't respect a liar.

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Breaking News

It looks like IU is going to name Kelvin Sampson head coach. I am ok with this hiring. I think too much emphasis was placed on trying to find someone with IU ties, like Steve Alford. I don't think that is a problem if Sampson has no IU connections, as long as he can win.

Yahoo! Article

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Pictures from Arizona


I picked these


Up at the top of the grapefruit tree


Surprise Stadium


More of Surprise

Saturday, March 25, 2006

Updates

I am fiddling around with the colors on the site, so if it looks like some sort of technocolor barf for a few days, trust me, I'm working on it.

Monday, March 13, 2006

World Baseball Classic

I have to admit that I am in that group of people who dismissed the WBC before it started, then was promptly sucked in. I've been watching it when I get a chance. At first I thought I was just interested because baseball is baseball and I (along with many of you) have suffered the baseball-less winter months. But yesterday, I found myself fretting over having A-Rod at the plate with 2 outs against the Japanese team. Fortunately he came through.

I didn't see the tag-up controversy live. I spent innings 7 and 8 at dinner. On replay, it looks like the umps made the correct call the first time. I'm not going to go so far as to say that there is some sort of US-centric conspiracy theory. As an intramural umpire, I have a certain level of understanding for the pressures of umpiring games, even though my decisions aren't liable to start an international incident. Sometimes, you just have to accept that sometimes umpires make mistakes. I know I've made mistakes, but they are never intentional, and I have to believe that that is the case here.

Google Group Discussion: WBC

Keeping up with SBG

Over at SBG's new place, he got himself a nice new message board. I couldn't let him get away with this, so I looked for a way to get my own. Since I'm hosted by Blogger, and don't have my own server, I can't have the setup SBG has. Instead I've started a Google Group. My hope for this group is for it to be a place where you, my loyal readers, can come together and discuss. Most of my feedback comes in email form. Sometimes two emails would spark an interesting discussion if one knew about the other. So the group is a chance to do just that - join the HIWTHI world together. I'm a uniter (with the appropriate hand motions, of course). To join the group, click here. I don't know how signing up works - if you need a Gmail account or not. I already had one and used it. If it is the case you need one, email me, and I'll get you a Gmail address.

Sunday, March 12, 2006

NCAA Tourney

The MVC got 4 teams into the NCAA Tournament - UNI, Bradley, Wichita State, and Southern Illinois. My school, Drake, beat Bradley and took UNI down to the last second, losing when a Hail Mary clanked out. Go MVC. (And as always, go IU) For your bracket filling out purposes, here's a repost of my guidelines for your first round games. Don't knock my system. I won a 300+ person pool last year with it.

1. Always take #1 and #2 seeds. No #1's and only 4 #2's have lost in the first round since 1985. Figuring 152 first round games for #1 &2's (2 per bracket, 4 brackets = 8 games per year times 19 years =152), the winning percentage is then 97.36%. I'm not filling out my bracket with a #15 on a 3% chance.

2. Watch the #3 and #4 seeds carefully. Often, teams are ranked #1 or #2 based on reputation, bumping more deserving teams down to 3 and 4 seeds. These teams are probably going to win. Don't think you're cool and look for upset here. Instead...

3. Upset points come at 5 and 6 seeds. Quite often, the 11 and 12 teams are quite the scrappers and you should watch out for them.

4. 7, 8, 9, and 10 seeds are all too similar. Spend the most of your time here. I don't even consider a 10 seed winning that big of an upset. Make sure to look at each team's conference and record therein. A 10 seed with an above .500 record in the Big East or Pac-10 will beat a 7 seed with an above .500 out of C-USA or MAC more often than not. Also, common opponents are very helpful if there are any, but there aren't usually common opponents.

5. Never have your seeds in the second round matchup add up to more than 14. If you have your 11 seed beating the 6, make sure they are playing the 3 seed next. Two upsets next to each other like this don't happen.
Don't forget to join my pool if you are so inclined. Link is here. Pool number is: 5465 Password is: eddiepope

Friday, March 03, 2006

NCAA Tourney Pool

Loyal readers, you are all invited to join my NCAA Pool. As was last year, you are playing only for your pride. Even if I did promise you prizes, you know you'd never get them as I am waaaaay too lazy for that. Here is the information you need:

Group ID #: 5465
Password: eddiepope